28.1.2007 | 17:13
On Ranking Improvement
Nowadays, many departments and universities are working hard to move up in the Shanghai Jiao Tong University University Ranking, the Times Higher Education Supplement World University Ranking, the US News & World Report Ranking to name but a few. Indeed, a department/university has to continually improve itself just to maintain its current position. Is it worthwhile to set oneself the goal of becoming a top 100 university in the world, say?
Readers of this blog, if there are any, might find the opinion of Moshe Vardi, a careful observer of academic life and one of the outstanding computer scientists of our time, on this issue illuminating. In his interview Moshe Vardi Speaks Out (on the Proof, the Whole Proof, and Nothing But the Proof) by Marianne Winslett (SIGMOD RECORD, Volume 35, Number 1, March 2006), Moshe said:
The goal of improving a departments ranking is not a realistic goal. You can say that you want to have more graduate students; that is something you can measure: how many graduate students do you admit per year? You can look at the average GRE score of the students, and say that you would like to have better graduate students. You can say that you would like to see your department getting more funding. There are all kinds of things you can measure and you can control, but you cannot control the ranking that US News will generate with their complex formulas. Since everybody is trying to improve, it would be nice if you could squeeze more departments into the top ten. But since only ten departments can be in the top ten, I think it is not a useful goal for departments to have. I would advise departments to focus on measurable goals and attainable goals. I never felt that the goal of ranking improvement was useful or attainable.
(The emphasis is mine.) I think that all of the Icelandic universities would benefit by following, or at least considering carefully, Moshe's advice. For instance, to the best of my knowledge, there are now three PhD students in computer science in Icelandic universities. What about setting ourselves the goal of improving that number fourfold, say? On a different note, a quick and dirty count indicates that the members of staff affiliated with computer science departments in Iceland have all together about 330 entries in the DBLP (one of the most comprehensive bibliographic databases for computer science researchers available at http://www.informatik.uni-trier.de/~ley/db/index.html). I might set computer science at Reykjavík University the goal to achieve 300 entries in the DBLP within five years. If we can do so, other forms of recognition will surely follow.
Tenglar
Stjórnmálamenn međ vit á menntamálum og vísindum
Áhugafólk um menntamál og vísindi
Greinar og skýrslur
Fyrirtćki og félagasamtök
Rannsóknarstofnanir
Vísindi, frćđi og tćkni
Stofnanir og Skólar
Ađstandendur
- Heiđa María Sigurđardóttir
- Indriđi H. Indriđason
- Arnar Pálsson
- Inga Dóra Sigfúsdóttir
- Anna Ingólfsdóttir
- Guđrún Valdimarsdóttir
- Ţórarinn Guđjónsson
- Luca Aceto
- Einar Steingrímsson
- Eiríkur Steingrímsson
- Magnús Karl Magnússon
- Pétur Henry Petersen
Fćrsluflokkar
Heimsóknir
Flettingar
- Í dag (22.12.): 0
- Sl. sólarhring:
- Sl. viku: 1
- Frá upphafi: 0
Annađ
- Innlit í dag: 0
- Innlit sl. viku: 1
- Gestir í dag: 0
- IP-tölur í dag: 0
Uppfćrt á 3 mín. fresti.
Skýringar
Athugasemdir
Addendum: By the way, to put things into perspective, Moshe Vardi alone has 314 DBLP entries. He is a truly outstanding scientists, and his level of visibility is no surprise to active computer science researchers. These numbers just show how long we have to go to become truly competitive on the world arena.
luca (IP-tala skráđ) 29.1.2007 kl. 09:51
Bćta viđ athugasemd [Innskráning]
Ekki er lengur hćgt ađ skrifa athugasemdir viđ fćrsluna, ţar sem tímamörk á athugasemdir eru liđin.